Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Griffin v. Stonebreaker et al
as 1:2024cv01541
Plaintiff:
Gary Jason Griffin
Defendant:
Warden Donnie Stonebreaker, Jr, Associate Warden Gause, Associate Warden Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Norris v. Stonebreaker
as 0:2024cv00135
Petitioner:
John Foster Norris
Respondent:
Captain Donnie Stonebreaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifton Lyles v. Governor Henry McMaster
as 23-7229
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLIFTON DONELL LYLES
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, DIRECTOR BRYAN P. STIRLING, WARDEN DONNIE STONEBREAKER and others
Norris v. Stonebreaker
as 23-3941
Petitioner:
JOHN FOSTER NORRIS
Respondent:
DONNIE STONEBREAKER, JR.
Norris v. Stonebreaker
as 4:2023cv06165
Petitioner:
John Foster Norris
Respondent:
Warden Donnie Stonebreaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Norris v. Stonebreaker
as 23-3753
Petitioner:
JOHN FOSTER NORRIS
Respondent:
DONNIE STONEBREAKER, JR., WARDEN
Dunbar Jr. v. Stonebreaker
as 9:2023cv05323
Petitioner:
Joseph Wadell Dunbar Jr.
Respondent:
Donnie Stonebreaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boatwright v. Warden Donnie Stonebreaker et al
as 0:2023cv05069
Petitioner:
Marquives Boatwright
Respondent:
Warden Donnie Stonebreaker and SC, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Stonebreaker
as 9:2023cv03655
Petitioner:
Clayton J. Washington
Respondent:
Donnie Stonebreaker, Warden Evans Corr. Inst.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Stonebreaker
as 9:2023cv03232
Petitioner:
Clayton J. Washington
Respondent:
Warden Donnie Stonebreaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
