Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Dooley et al v. Jefferson Surgical Clinic, Inc.
as 7:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Rocky Dooley and Kurt Rice
Defendant:
Jefferson Surgical Clinic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kiser v. Carlton et al
as 7:2021cv00455
Plaintiff:
Brandon Darrell Kiser
Defendant:
Howard Carlton, Tom Dooley and Dr. Josef
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonds v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2021cv00363
Defendant:
Sheriff Tim Allen, Roanoke City Commonwealth Attorney Office, Roanoke City Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Durwin Evant Bonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Huang, MD v. Dooley, MD et al
as 1:2018cv00519
Plaintiff:
Shuyan Huang, MD
Defendant:
Joseph Dooley, MD, David Kaufman, MD, Kari Schenck, PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alicimeus v. Immigration Center of America, LLC, et al
as 3:2015cv00740
Plaintiff:
Christian Alicimeus
Defendant:
Immigration Center of America, LLC , Department of Homeland Security, Armor Correctional Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hughes v. Harler et al
as 1:2015cv00341
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Hughes
Defendant:
Harler, Dr. Dooley, Cane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Dooley et al
as 1:2014cv00415
Plaintiff:
Russell Edwards
Defendant:
Dooley and Loyall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giles v. Ulep et al
as 1:2013cv00179
Plaintiff:
Christopher Giles
Defendant:
Dr. Benjamin Ulep, Dr. Dooley and Nurse T. Overlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
