Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BOYD v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2020cv00054
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY BOYD, DOROTHY L. BOYD and THE ESTATE OF GOLDIE HOES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyd v. Accord Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv08908
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Boyd
Defendant:
Accord Healthcare, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Hospira, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyd et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv14223
Plaintiff:
Ralph Boyd and Dorothy Boyd
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brenda Armstrong, et al v. Glaxosmithkline LLC
as 13-80196
Plaintiff - Respondent:
BRENDA ARMSTRONG, JOBY BAKER, LATONYA BANKS and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Armstrong v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03113
Plaintiff:
Brenda Armstrong , Joby Baker , Latonya Banks and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Armstrong v. McKesson Corporation et al
as CAN/3:13-cv-03113
Plaintiff:
Brenda Armstrong , Joby Baker , Latonya Banks and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
BOYD v. MCIC, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv76814
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY BOYD
Defendant:
MCIC, INC., UNIROYAL, INC., RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Dorothy Boyd, etc. v. MCIC, Inc., et al.
as MD/1:07-CV-03311
Defendant:
MCIC, Inc
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Boyd, etc.
Boyd v. MCIC, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv03311
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Boyd and Dorothy Boyd
Defendant:
MCIC, Inc., Uniroyal, Inc., Rapid American Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
