Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 341
White v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00189
Petitioner: Derek L. White
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leo Farnsworth v. Glenn Youngkin
as 24-6273
Plaintiff: LEO BRANDON FARNSWORTH
Defendant: GLENN YOUNGKIN, TERRANCE C. COLE, CHADWICK DOTSON and others
Christopher Lumpkin v. VDOC Director Dotson
as 24-6275
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER DEWAYNE LUMPKIN
Defendant: VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR CHADWICK DOTSON, SUSSEX I STATE PRISON MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, MS. CARTER, Head of All Medical Departments of Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Dotson v. Town of Lake View
as 4:2024cv01358
Plaintiff: Jennifer Dotson
Defendant: Town of Lake View
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Michael Fuller v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6254
Petitioner: MICHAEL ROY FULLER
Respondent: CHADWICK DOTSON, Director
Dudley v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00451
Petitioner: Christopher Dudley
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Springer v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2024cv00193
Plaintiff: Levi G. Springer
Defendant: Virginia Department of Corrections, Chadwick Dotson, Director of Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00194
Plaintiff: Demetrius D. Wallace
Defendant: Chadwick S. Dotson, Gregory Holloway, Rick White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khalil Salahuddin v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6245
Petitioner: KHALIL SALAHUDDIN
Respondent: CHADWICK DOTSON
Stephens v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00170
Petitioner: Derek J. Stephens
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?