Civil Rights Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00229
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01670
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dotson et al v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv01657
Plaintiff: Audrey Marie Dotson and Audrey South
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections, John Q. Hamm, Greg Lovelace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Long v. City of Sheffield Alabama et al
as 3:2023cv00731
Plaintiff: Marvin Eugene Long
Defendant: City of Sheffield Alabama, County of Colbert Alabama, Max Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00573
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
DeVaughn v. Sheffield, Alabama, City of et al
as 3:2021cv01086
Plaintiff: Sebastian DeVaughn
Defendant: Sheffield, Alabama, City of, Ricky Terry, Drake Seal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00824
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00830
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dotson v. City of Hartselle, Alabama
as 5:2016cv00730
Plaintiff: Cecil D. Dotson
Defendant: City of Hartselle, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00526
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?