Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Adkins et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02641
Plaintiff:
Todd Adkins, Temitope Amusa, Julio Avila and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Dotson v. Smith
as 0:2023cv01741
Plaintiff:
Howard Dotson
Defendant:
Harding Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dallas-Dotson v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 0:2022cv02844
Plaintiff:
Karlon Dallas-Dotson
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Dotson v. Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare
as 0:2022cv02046
Plaintiff:
Howard Dotson
Defendant:
Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Dotson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv01087
Defendant:
3M Occupational Safety LLC, Aearo Intermediate LLC, Aearo Technologies LLC and others
Plaintiff:
James Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Dotson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv01086
Defendant:
3M Occupational Safety LLC, Aearo Intermediate LLC, Aearo Technologies LLC and others
Plaintiff:
James Dotson
Larsen et al v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2021cv00568
Plaintiff:
Mark Wallace, Aaron Hayes, Shawn Fletcher and others
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Minnesota County's Health and Human Services, Minnesota Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorado et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00969
Plaintiff:
Aron Farmer, Andrew Dutil, Chris Hagen and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Dotson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv03924
Plaintiff:
Irma Dotson
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dotson v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv00423
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Maxine Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
