Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Rabin v. McClain et al
as 2:2018mc00029
Petitioner:
Eleanor Z Rabin
Defendant:
Douglas A McClain, Sr., Argyll Biotechnologies LLC, Padmore Holdings Limited and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
SEC v. Douglas McClain, Sr., et al
as 14-3500
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellant:
DOUGLAS A. MCCLAIN, SR. and DOUGLAS A. MCCLAIN, JR.
Elton et al v. McClain et al
as 3:2013mc00460
Plaintiff:
Gary G. Elton and William Foster
Defendant:
Douglas A McClain, Sr., Debra A. McClaim, Immunosyn Corporation and others
Rabin v. McClain et al
as 3:2013mc00459
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Z. Rabin
Defendant:
Douglas A. McClain, Sr., Argyll Biotechnologies LLC, Padmore Holdings, LTD. and others
Campbell v. Immunosyn Corporation et al
as 4:2012mc00001
Plaintiff:
Denise Campbell
Defendant:
Immunosyn Corporation, Argyll Biotechnolgies, LLC, James T. Miceli and others
Suglia v. McClain et al
as 5:2011mc00819
Defendant:
Immunosyn Corporation and Douglas A. McClain, Sr.
Plaintiff:
Louis Suglia
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Ferrone et al
as 1:2011cv05223
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Stephen D. Ferrone, Douglas A. McClain, Sr., Douglas A McClain, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Elton et al v. McClain et al
as 5:2011cv00559
Plaintiff:
Gary G. Elton and D. William Foster
Defendant:
Immunosyn Corporation, Debra A. McClain, Douglas A. McClain, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Rabin v. McClain, Sr. et al
as 5:2010cv00981
Defendant:
Argyll Biotechnologies, LLC, Douglas A. McClain, Sr. and James T. Miceli
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Z. Rabin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Suglia v. McClain et al
as 8:2010cv02594
Plaintiff:
Louis Suglia
Defendant:
Douglas A. McClain, Sr. and Immunosyn Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
