Cases 1 - 10 of 13
John Alexander v. Jonathan Nance
as 23-7071
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN DOUGLAS ALEXANDER
Respondent / Appellee:
JONATHAN NANCE, Warden, Tyger River Correctional Institution
Alexander v. Warden Tyger River
as 6:2023cv03145
Petitioner:
John Douglas Alexander
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Defendant:
Jonathan Nance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Wright et al
as 7:2023cv02178
Plaintiff:
Douglas Alexander Wright
Defendant:
Sheriff Chuck Wright, Judge Cole and Spencer Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. Wright
as 2:2023cv02176
Petitioner:
Douglas Alexander Wright
Respondent:
Sheriff Chuck Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Sheriff Chuck Wright
as 2:2023cv02177
Petitioner:
Douglas Alexander Wright
Respondent:
Sheriff Chuck Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Wright v. Nurse Allane Roach et al
as 2:2023cv01635
Plaintiff:
Douglas Alexander Wright
Defendant:
Nurse Allane Roach, Nurse Sonya Pax, Nurse/ Med-Tech Carol Fernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
John Alexander v. Bryan Stirling
as 20-6248
Defendant / Appellee:
THE SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KURT STEVENS, Agent Individial and Official Capacities, M. N. BARKER, Disciplinary Hearing Officer Individial and Official Capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOUGLAS ALEXANDER
Alexander v. Stirling et al
as 6:2019cv00215
Defendant:
M Barker, Charles Williams, Bryan Stirling and others
Plaintiff:
John Douglas Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Alexander v. Leroy Cartledge
as 17-6571
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN DOUGLAS ALEXANDER
Respondent - Appellee:
LEROY CARTLEDGE, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
