Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Douglas Lewis Bell v. Moana Management, LLC
as 23-6008
Debtor:
In re: DLB II, LLC
Appellant:
Douglas Lewis Bell
Claimant:
Moana Management, LLC
Ratfield et al v. United States Drug Testing Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv15063
Plaintiff:
Andrea Ratfield, Anne Marie Kelly, Richard Spindler and others
Defendant:
United States Drug Testing Laboratories, Inc., Douglas Lewis, Joseph Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ratfield et al v. United States Drug Testing Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv62325
Plaintiff:
Andrea Ratfield, Anne Marie Kelly, Richard Spindler and others
Defendant:
United States Drug Testing Laboratories, Inc., Douglas Lewis, Joseph Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19822
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS LEWIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lewis v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company,
as 4:2021cv00034
Plaintiff:
Douglas Lewis
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Capital I Inc. Trust 2003-NC2, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2003-NC2, PHH Mortgage Corporation and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Lewis v. Saul
as 2:2020cv12516
Plaintiff:
Douglas Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Lewis v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company
as 2:2019cv10864
Defendant:
Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Douglas Lewis
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Lewis v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company
as 2:2017cv13479
Plaintiff:
Douglas Lewis
Defendant:
Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Lewis v. Peters
as 1:2017cv00357
Petitioner:
James Douglas Lewis, Jr.
Respondent:
Kenneth Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
