Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Renfrow-Harris v. Harris et al
as 2:2023cv00172
Defendant:
Steven Burke Fall, Michelle Castendra, Joshua Clinton Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Joslyn Marie Renfrow-Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00386
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Shreve, et al v. Franklin County Ohio, et al
as 13-3119
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SHREVE, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DAWN FIORE-BRUNO, Individually and MICHAEL WORLEY, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL REED, Individually
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANKLIN COUNTY OHIO, MARK BARRETT, Individually and in his official capacity (Franklin County Sheriff's Office Chief Deputy, Corrections), STEPHAN L. MARTIN, Individually and others
JEFFERSON v. CUJDIK et al
as 2:2011cv07601
Plaintiff:
OMAR JEFFERSON
Defendant:
JEFFREY CUJDIK, DOUGLAS ROBINSON, GREGORY BARBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Worley et al v. Franklin County, Ohio et al
as 2:2011cv00415
Plaintiff:
Michael Worley , Robert Shreve and Frankie Mosley
Defendant:
Franklin County, Ohio, Jim Karnes, Mark Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shreve et al v. Franklin County Ohio et al
as 2:2010cv00644
Plaintiff:
Robert Shreve , Michael Reed and Dawn Fiore-Bruno
Defendant:
Franklin County Ohio, Sheriff Franklin County, Mark Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid Machinery Inc., et al v. Nicholas Lanzer, et al
as 09-3665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REID MACHINERY INC. and HOWARD DOUGLAS ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NICHOLAS LANZER, JEFFEREY ROMES, DENNIS M. BELL and others
Reid Machinery Inc. et al v. Lanzer et al
as 3:2007cv02866
Plaintiff:
Reid Machinery Inc. and Howard Douglas Robinson
Defendant:
Nicholas Lanzer and Jefferey Romes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
