Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Elliott v. Valeska et al (INMATE 1)

as 1:2019cv00235
Defendant:
Douglas A. Valeska, Bill Rafferty, Jackie Smith
and others
Plaintiff:
Gene Chandler Elliott, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
McDougald v. Woodall et al (INMATE 2)

as 1:2018cv00748
Plaintiff:
Rufus Terry McDougald, Jr.
Defendant:
Douglas A. Valeska, Patrick B. Jones, III, Carla Woodall
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 1:2018cv00543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Yeager v. Binford et al (INMATE 2)

as 1:2018cv00526
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Yeager
Defendant:
Henry Binford, Mark Saliba, Billy Helms
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 1:2017cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
McDougald v. Houston County Sheriff's Office et al (INMATE 2)

as 1:2016cv00838
Plaintiff:
Rufus Terry McDougald, Jr.
Defendant:
Houston County Sheriff's Office, Douglas A. Valeska, Donald Valenza
and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Hall et al (INMATE 2)

as 1:2016cv00710
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Ronald Hall, Douglas A. Valeska
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis et al v. Valenza et al (INMATE 1)

as 1:2015cv00913
Plaintiff:
Kharon Torchec Davis
Defendant:
Donald Valenza, Douglas A. Valeska, Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dozier v. Armstrong et al (MAG+)

as 1:2015cv00117
Plaintiff:
Mary L.R. Dozier
Defendant:
Lawton Armstrong, Robert Bentley, Butch Binford
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Tullis v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)

as 2:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
Lisa McKinley Tullis
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Ray Wiehe, Kim Turner
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.