Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Gard v. Little et al
as 4:2024cv04092
Plaintiff:
Rex Gard
Defendant:
Dr. Richard Little and Thomas E. Brady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Kingdom Holdings, LLC et al v. Foss et al
as 5:2023cv05060
Plaintiff:
Kingdom Holdings, LLC doing business as Dr. Dent and Mark Durham, Sr
Defendant:
Deputy Chaz Foss, Deputy Kaitlin Leising, Deputy William Daivis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv04135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Asfora v. Sanford Health et al
as 4:2020cv04032
Defendant:
Sanford Clinic and Sanford Health
Plaintiff:
Dr. Wilson Asfora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01023
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv04150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Stenseth v. Karpen et al
as 4:2019cv04117
Defendant:
Deb Bowman, State of South Dakota, Department of Social Services and others
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaFleur v. Krebs et al
as 4:2018cv04125
Defendant:
Lora Hubbel, Shantel Krebs, Joel Bergan and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Terry Lee LaFleur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
