Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Mitchell v. Bates et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00268
Plaintiff:
Larry H. Mitchell
Defendant:
Dr. Gurlee, Nurse Terry, Dr. Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Horrison Health Care et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00249
Defendant:
Horrison Health Care, Dr. Gurlee and Dr. Bates
Plaintiff:
Larry H. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodruff v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv01700
Plaintiff:
Courtney L Woodruff
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, QCHC, Dr Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Yeager v. Fondren et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00585
Plaintiff:
Robert Terrell Yeager
Defendant:
Capt. Fondren, Lt. Bedsole, Dr. Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv01081
Plaintiff:
Larry Dean Garrett, Jr
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Quality Corrections Health Care, Officer K Boird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Files v. Tallapoosa County Narcotics Task Force et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2016cv00770
Plaintiff:
Earnest J. Files, Jr.
Defendant:
Tallapoosa County Narcotics Task Force, Jimmy Abbett, E. Paul Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goggins v. Bates et al
as 2:2016cv00549
Plaintiff:
Bobby S. Goggins
Defendant:
Dr. Bates, J. Foudren, Shelby County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy v. Derzis et al
as 2:2016cv00188
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jon Guy
Defendant:
Nick Derzis, Municipality of Hoover, AL, Dr. Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goode v. Quality Correctional Healthcare et al
as 1:2015cv00080
Plaintiff:
David Jason Goode
Defendant:
Quality Correctional Healthcare, Dr. Bates, Bradley County Sherrifs Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy v. Municipality of Hoover, AL et al
as 2:2014cv01092
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jon Guy
Defendant:
Municipality of Hoover, AL, Nick Joseph, Andy Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
