Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Stanfield v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 2)(CONSENT)
as 2:2013cv00452
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Stanfield
Defendant:
Dr. Darbouze and Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinson v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00386
Plaintiff:
Alexander Brinson
Defendant:
Dr. Darbouze, Dr. West and Kay Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKenzie v. Boyd et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2011cv00259
Plaintiff:
Tracy McKenzie
Defendant:
Louis Boyd, Alabama Department of Corrections, Correctional Medical Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harkless v. Boyd et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2010cv00666
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ray Harkless
Defendant:
Louis Boyd, Dr. Darbouze, Dr. Olbeter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kambui v. Boyd et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00002
Plaintiff:
Owanna Kambui
Defendant:
Louis Boyd, Carter F. Davenport, Dr. Darbouze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. Boyd et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv01113
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hines
Defendant:
Louis Boyd, Ms Seal and Dr. Darbouze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinson v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv01022
Plaintiff:
Alexander Brinson
Defendant:
Dr. Darbouze , Kay Wilson , Nurse Cauley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander Brinson v. Darbouze et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00746
Plaintiff:
Alexander Brinson
Defendant:
Dr. Darbouze, Administrator Wilson and Nurse Hagler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinson v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv00747
Plaintiff:
Alexander Brinson
Defendant:
Dr. Darbouze, Administrator Wilson, Nurse Jolly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Darbouze et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2007cv00630
Plaintiff:
Barry Randall Thomas
Defendant:
Dr. Darbouze, Nurse Wilson and Warden Davenport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
