Cases 1 - 10 of 13
George v. Product Slingshot, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00296
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Think 3D/Prelude, Inc. and Product Slingshot, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dr. David George and Dr David George
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS, INC. v. CARTER
as 1:2018cv02209
Defendant:
Dr. David Carter and DAVID CARTER
Plaintiff:
ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS, INC., a California corporation and ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. ONEMAIN FINANCIAL
as 3:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
DR. DAVID HARRIS, III
Defendant:
ONEMAIN FINANCIAL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Washington v. Parkview Hospital et al
as 3:2016cv00552
Plaintiff:
Christopher E Washington
Defendant:
Parkview Hospital and Dr. David Gertzen MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON et al v. ADAMS, et al.
as 1:2015cv00220
Defendant:
PAM AALTONEN, DR. JEROME ADAMS, DR. JEREMY P. ADLER and others
Plaintiff:
I. J. B., ELIZABETH BUSH-SAWYER, TONYA BUSH-SAWYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Chau et al
as 1:2011cv00395
Plaintiff:
Christopher E Washington
Defendant:
Dr Julie Chau, Dr Charles Coats, Dr Joseph Fortin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00308
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MCINTOSH v. WEBSTER et al
as 2:2009cv00103
Plaintiff:
CARL MCINTOSH
Defendant:
DR. THOMAS WEBSTER, DR. WILLIAM WILSON, DR. DAVID LUKEN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
