Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Norwood v. Wexford Health Service Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01457
Plaintiff:
Randy Norwood
Defendant:
Wexford Health Service Inc., Dr. West, Kim Czerniak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Miller et al
as 3:2022cv01358
Plaintiff:
Lee Frank Adams
Defendant:
I. G. Miller, Lt. Aiken, Sgt. J. Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. West et al
as 3:2022cv01270
Plaintiff:
Lee Frank Adams
Defendant:
Dr. West, Nurse Perry, Lieutenant Aiken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. Kane county Sheriff (Ron Hanes) et al
as 1:2022cv05172
Plaintiff:
Kevin Parks
Defendant:
Kane county Sheriff (Ron Hanes), Wexford Health Sources Inc., Kim Czerniak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby v. West et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00831
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Dr. West, Ms. Driggers and Ms. Blackmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacoby v. McCoy et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00723
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy, Ms. Bibb, NP Ferrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Paul Hollister Jr. v. Wexford Medical, et al.
as 1:2021cv02539
Defendant:
Dr. West, Aurora Police Department, Bill Woods and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Paul Hollister, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilder v. Hain et al
as 1:2020cv06940
Defendant:
Ron Hain and Dr. West
Plaintiff:
Darren Wilder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broughton v. West (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00840
Plaintiff:
Maurice Gerell Broughton
Defendant:
Dr. West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephanie Bekendam v. TDCJ-CID/Parole, et al
as 16-50380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHANIE LYNN BEKENDAM
Defendant - Appellee:
TDCJ-CID/PAROLE, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH - GATESVILLE, WITCHITA COUNTY, TEXAS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
