Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Drake v. Unknown
as 7:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Timothy W. Drake, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drakes-Pierre v. Aldi (N.C.) LLC
as 2:2022cv00346
Plaintiff:
Natasia Drakes-Pierre
Defendant:
Aldi (N.C.) LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Drake v. Director S.W. VA. Regional Jail
as 7:2022cv00382
Petitioner:
Timothy Wayne Drake
Respondent:
Director S.W. VA. Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Drake v. S.W. VA. Regional Jail
as 7:2022cv00381
Petitioner:
Timothy Wayne Drake
Respondent:
S.W. VA. Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Correct Care Solution et al
as 2:2020cv00503
Defendant:
Roderick Valerio, Cynthia Adu, Pamela Westbrook and others
Plaintiff:
George Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drake v. Clarke et al
as 7:2020cv00006
Defendant:
Sue Yates, Dave Maples, Kevin T. Punturi and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne Drake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Unknown
as 1:2019cv00153
Defendant:
Unknown, Dwight Squire, Drake Vaughan and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Woody et al
as 3:2017cv00167
Plaintiff:
Benjamin M. Andrews
Defendant:
C. T. Woody , John/Jane Doe(s) Jail Staff, Naphcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers, LLP et al
as 4:2013cv00105
Plaintiff:
Shameka Lavonda Sanders
Defendant:
Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers, LLP, Performance Recovery and Experian Information Solutions Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Pamp v. Dawson et al
as 3:2012cv00855
Plaintiff:
Travis D. Pamp
Defendant:
R. Dawson, Pratt, Weathersby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
