Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Drennen v. GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv18617
Plaintiff:
Roy Drennen
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Pfizer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Drennen v. Olympus America, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00357
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Ralph Drennen and Linda Drennen
Defendant:
Olympus America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Drennen v. Olympus America, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00601
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Ralph Drennen
Defendant:
Olympus America, Inc. and Veritiv Operating Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards v. McCormick et al
as 5:2021cv00407
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Edwards
Defendant:
FNU McCormick, FNU Garcia, Peyton C. Grinnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowena Drennen et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London
as 2:2020mc00330
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London
Plaintiff:
RESCAP Liquidating Trust, Roger Turner, John Picard and others
Petitioner:
William Lutz
Debtor:
Residential Capital, LLC et al
Drennen et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London
as 5:2020mc80217
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London
Petitioner:
Eugene Elsbree and Kelly Nugent
Plaintiff:
RESCAP Liquidating Trust, Roger Turner, John Picard and others
DRENNEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv76034
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOE DRENNEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Terry Drennen
as 20-40406
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRY DRENNEN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DRENNEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv90635
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOE DRENNEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
