Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Frank Dufour v. Robert Allen, et al
as 17-55999
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK DUFOUR, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT ALLEN, an individual, PROSPER, INC., EDUCATION SUCCESS INCORPORATED and others
Maureen Cusick et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2015cv08831
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bruno, Maureen Cusick, Eric Dufour and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Frank Dufour v. Robert Allen et al
as 2:2014cv05616
Defendant:
Robert Allen, Aurora Loan Services, D.A.H.A.R. and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Dufour
Cross Defendant:
PROSPER, INC
Timothy DuFour, et al v. Monterey Financial Services In
as 13-80133
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
TIMOTHY DUFOUR, on his behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated and JEANNE DUFOUR, on her behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Respondent:
MONTEREY FINANCIAL SERVICES INC., a California corporation
Dufour v. Home Show Mortgage Incorporated et al
as 2:2012cv01736
Plaintiff:
Judy Dufour
Defendant:
Home Show Mortgage Incorporated, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated, Nationstar Mortgage LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dufour v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 2:2012cv01579
Plaintiff:
Judy Dufour
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC , Home Show Mortgage Incorporated, Quality Loan Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Frank Dufour v. Robert Allen et al
as 2:2011cv08054
Defendant:
Robert Allen, Aurora Loan Services, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Dufour
Anthony Lehr, et al v. City of Sacramento
as 11-17197
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANTHONY LEHR, CONNIE HOPSON, FLOYD HOPWOOD and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF SACRAMENTO
City of Sacramento v. Anthony Lehr, et al
as 09-80144
Petitioner:
CITY OF SACRAMENTO
Respondent:
ANTHONY LEHR, CONNIE HOPSON, FLOYD HOPWOOD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv03770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
