Cases 41 - 50 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01395
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Duckworth v. United States of America
as 8:2019cv01263
Plaintiff:
James Duckworth
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
SHAW v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2018cv00082
Defendant:
Warden Billy Wicker, MS IRWIN, Lt. Franklin and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Shaw and Christopher Jason Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAW v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00194
Defendant:
MS IRWIN, JANE DOE, BILLY WICKER and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER J SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-11006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Duckworth v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2017cv00299
Plaintiff:
Katherine Duckworth
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Duckworth v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv04750
Plaintiff:
Donta M. Duckworth
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Duckworth v. Broaderick et al
as 5:2016cv00672
Plaintiff:
James B. Duckworth, III
Defendant:
Charles Craig Broaderick and Marion County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Tree-Removal Rights With Respect To Land In Gordon County, Georgia et al
as 4:2016cv00339
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tree-Removal Rights With Respect To Land In Gordon County, Georgia, James W. Hobgood and Pamela Duckworth
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
United States of America v. Tree-Removal Rights With Respect To Land In Gordon County, Georgia et al
as 4:2016cv00340
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tree-Removal Rights With Respect To Land In Gordon County, Georgia and Pamela Hobgood Duckworth
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
