Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Kendrick v. Gilbert et al
as 1:2011cv00110
Defendant:
Stephen A Gilbert, V Spence, N Brandon and others
Plaintiff:
Catherynne Kendrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pryor-Kendrick v. Deen et al
as 1:2010cv00002
Plaintiff:
Theresa C W Pryor-Kendrick
Defendant:
Jeffery T Deen, Michael Copeland, Jeffery T Mclain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pryor-Kendrick v. Webb et al
as 5:2009cv03232
Plaintiff:
Theresa C.W. Pryor-Kendrick
Defendant:
Judy Webb, Stephanie England, Rhonda Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry-Miller et al v. Steed et al
as 1:2008cv00059
Plaintiff:
Catherynne W Kendrick and Frances Renee Perry/Miller
Defendant:
Judith R Steed, Sonya Douglas, Judy Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Perry-Miller, et al vs. Judith Steed, et al
as 5:2008cv05240
Plaintiff:
Frances R. Perry-Miller and Catherynne W. Kendrick
Defendant:
Judith R. Steed, Sonya Douglas, Judy Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kendrick et al v. Dunavion et al
as 1:2008cv00044
Plaintiff:
Catherynne W Kendrick and Valarie King
Defendant:
Lavando K Dunavion, Patrica A Roberts, Candice Ashby and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Eaton v. Dunavion
as 1:2008cv00032
Plaintiff:
Detina Eaton
Defendant:
Dunavion
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Eaton v. Jones et al
as 1:2008cv00009
Plaintiff:
Detina Eaton
Defendant:
Jones, Murphy, Sharon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaton v. Sherman et al
as 1:2008cv00008
Plaintiff:
Detina Eaton
Defendant:
David A Sherman, Stewart, John Maples, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stratton v. Maples et al
as 1:2007cv00053
Plaintiff:
Polly Stratton
Defendant:
John Maples, Jr, Maggie Capel, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
