Cases 1 - 10 of 89
DUNN v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DUNN
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC, NAVEEN RAJOLI, SAMUEL BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WRIGHT v. DUNN et al
as 1:2023cv01363
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
DUNN, MARK SEVIER, JENNIFER FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hecke v. Beck et al
as 1:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Steven John Hecke
Defendant:
Richard Beck, David Gladieux, David Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. JONES et al
as 1:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
JAMA JONES, MARK SEVIER, JENNIFER FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ally Financial Inc. v. Dunn
as 3:2022cv01029
Plaintiff:
Ally Financial Inc.
Defendant:
Stephen J Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Diaz v. Neal et al
as 3:2022cv00874
Plaintiff:
Rolando L Diaz
Defendant:
Ron D Neal, C Frediarelli, G Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TESKY v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2022cv00375
Plaintiff:
JASON ALAN TESKY
Defendant:
PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DUNN, M MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
