Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Murphy v. Aramark Food Service and Facilities Management, East Carolina University et al
as 4:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Larry F. Murphy
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service and Facilities Management, East Carolina University, ARAMARK Campus, LLC, Kelvin Tarakwasha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Dupree Farms, LLC v. United States Department of Agriculture, et al
as 5:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Dupree Farms, LLC
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Risk Management Agency and Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Banks v. Huddleston et al
as 5:2019ct03079
Defendant:
Officer Hawkins, Officer Bittle, Officer Cornelius and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. USA
as 4:2018cv00182
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dupree Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Banks v. Page et al
as 5:2018ct03249
Defendant:
Kenneth Lassiter, Erik A. Hooks, Paula Page and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Page et al
as 5:2018ct03243
Defendant:
Kenneth Lassiter, Erik A. Hooks, Paula Page and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Asbell et al
as 5:2018ct03236
Defendant:
Kenneth Lassiter, Eric A. Hooks, Thomas Asbell and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Hooks et al
as 5:2018ct03208
Defendant:
Officer Hawkins, Officer Boyles, Mr. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seelig v. Lassiter et al
as 5:2018ct03206
Defendant:
Ms. Hawkins, Ms. West, Mr. Kearney and others
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Seelig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
