Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Hicks v. Department of Correction et al
as 2:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Nathan Leroy Hicks
Defendant:
Department of Correction and C.O. on Duty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton v. Jordan et al
as 4:2021cv01120
Plaintiff:
Nathan Jerry Stockton
Defendant:
Unknown Jordan, Unknown Triplet, Brenda Short and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Duty et al
as 1:2020cv00106
Defendant:
A & M Rental and Construction, LLC, Mark Higgins, Terry Duty and others
Plaintiff:
August Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGee v. Arnott et al
as 6:2018cv03208
Defendant:
Jim Arnott, John Doe 3, Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel L McGee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wise v. Branson Police Officers et al
as 6:2018cv03018
Plaintiff:
Matthew J Wise
Defendant:
Branson Police Officers, Branson Arresting Officer and Branson Sergeant on Duty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Witty et al
as 1:2017cv00115
Plaintiff:
Tremonti L. Perry
Defendant:
Karey L. Witty, Inee Wallace, Unknown Health Services Administrator SECC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Kaiser et al
as 3:2015cv05085
Plaintiff:
Sean Harris
Defendant:
Randee Kaiser, Stevens, Carnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeary v. St. Charles County Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2014cv02008
Plaintiff:
Reginald McNeary
Defendant:
St. Charles County Department of Corrections, Unknown Vaughn, Debbie Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaiser et al v. Heavy Duty Rebuilder's Supply, Inc.
as 6:2012cv03347
Plaintiff:
Jack Gaiser and Raquel Gaiser
Defendant:
Heavy Duty Rebuilder's Supply, Inc. and Ecology Auto Parts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cahill v. St. Louis County Justice Center et al
as 4:2012cv00059
Plaintiff:
Kevin Cahill
Defendant:
St. Louis County Justice Center, Brian Herschbay, Unknown Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
