Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Terrance Williams v. USA
as 24-11197
Petitioner:
TERRANCE DWAYNE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Terrance Williams
as 23-14084
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRANCE DWAYNE WILLIAMS
Williams v. Elmore Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00718
Plaintiff:
Chris Dwayne Williams
Defendant:
Elmore Correctional Facility, Lt. Carter, Ms. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCloud v. Classification Staff et al
as 4:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
Dwayne William McCloud
Defendant:
Classification Staff, Ms. Edwards, Ms. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12775
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE DWAYNE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Drake v. Pinellas County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 8:2022cv02673
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Drake, Jr., Yeremiyah Israel and Ulysses Drake Jr. Corp.
Defendant:
Pinellas County Sheriff's Office, Pinellas County Jail, Clearwater Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Gordy et al
as 7:2022cv01234
Plaintiff:
Chris Dwayne Williams
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy, Holtzshaw, Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Terrance Williams
as 21-14310
Petitioner:
In re: TERRANCE DWAYNE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Williams v. USA
as 1:2021cv00252
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Terrance Dwayne Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. C & W Lawn Care, Inc. et al
as 0:2020cv62249
Defendant:
Camile Williams, Camille Olliff and C & W Lawn Care, Inc. doing business as C & W Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tawan Dwayne Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
