Cases 1 - 10 of 350
Foster v. Lane et al
as 9:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Donald Foster
Defendant:
Darron Lane, Donald Muniz, Dwight L. Blackshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diogu v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline et al
as 1:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Diogu Kalu Diogu, II
Defendant:
Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Seana Willing, Amanda M. Kates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cavaness v. Dallas County et al
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Dwight Henry Cavaness
Defendant:
Dallas County and Grand Prairie City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones, III v. Muniz et al
as 9:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jones, III
Defendant:
Donald Muniz, Dwight Blackshire, Gabrielle Lovelady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Judge Keith Ellison
as 4:2023cv03726
Plaintiff:
Travis Dwight Green
Defendant:
Judge Keith Ellison, Kim Ogg and Devon Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Horton v. FBI et al
as 3:2023cv02138
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dwight Horton
Defendant:
FBI and KKK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Horton v. King
as 3:2023cv02049
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dwight Horton
Defendant:
Natasha King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Smith v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
as 4:2023cv03207
Plaintiff:
Dwight Smith
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Rosamond v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02966
Plaintiff:
Dwight D Rosamond
Defendant:
Bobbie Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Evens v. Raj Trucking, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00960
Plaintiff:
Museau Evens
Defendant:
Raj Trucking, LLC and Johnny Dwight Culver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
