Cases 1 - 10 of 294
Dyer v. Pearce
as 3:2024cv01405
Petitioner:
Jewel E. Dyer
Respondent:
Timothy Pearce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Dyer v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Christine Dyer
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 rp Diversity-Real Property
Lorie Atwater v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv01371
Plaintiff:
Lorie Atwater
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Deputy Brian Hudson, Detective Soraya Ely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dyer v. U.S. Supreme Court et al
as 3:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Jewel Dyer
Defendant:
U.S. Supreme Court, Scott S. Harris and Sara Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyer v. Li et al
as 3:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Jewel Evern Dyer
Defendant:
Deying Li and Thomas Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lorie Atwater v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv10546
Plaintiff:
LORIE ATWATER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Deputy Brian Hudson, Deputy Ely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dyer v. Warden of Mendocino County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv05762
Plaintiff:
Jewel Evern Dyer
Defendant:
Warden of Mendocino County Jail, Mendocino County Jail, Owner/Boss of Naph-Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Roark v. Dyer et al
as 2:2023cv02479
Plaintiff:
Jared W. Roark
Defendant:
Jerry Dyer, Margaret Mims, Manny Sandavol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Roark v. Dyer et al
as 1:2023cv01550
Plaintiff:
Jared W. Roark
Defendant:
Jerry Dyer, Margaret Mims, Manny Sandavol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Nieves et al
as 3:2023cv05246
Plaintiff:
Angee Burrell
Defendant:
Jo-Anna Nieves, Jimarielle Bowie and Kate Dyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
