Cases 1 - 10 of 22
MGA Entertainment, Inc. et al v. Dynacraft BSC, Inc.
as 2:2017cv08222
Defendant:
DOES, Dynacraft BSC Inc, Freshdeals2112 and others
Plaintiff:
MGA Entertainment Inc. and The Little Tikes Company
Fisher-Price, Inc. et al v. Dynacraft BSC, Inc.
as 3:2017cv03745
Plaintiff:
Fisher-Price, Inc. and Mattel Inc.
Defendant:
Dynacraft BSC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Fisher-Price, Inc. et al v. Dynacraft BSC, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00051
Plaintiff:
Fisher-Price, Inc. and Mattel, Inc.
Defendant:
Dynacraft BSC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Kettler International, Inc. v. Dynacraft BSC, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00727
Plaintiff:
Kettler International, Inc.
Defendant:
Dynacraft BSC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Dynacraft BSC, Inc. v. Pacific Cycle Inc.
as 3:2016cv04334
Defendant:
Pacific Cycle Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dynacraft BSC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Bussie v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03703
Defendant:
Bridgeway International, Inc., Dynacraft BSC, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bussie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Bernard v. Wal-Mart Stores et al
as 1:2014cv10233
Plaintiff:
Tyler Bernard
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Dynacraft Bsc, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Haws v. Dynacraft BSC, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
Glen Haws
Defendant:
Dynacraft BSC, Inc., Bridgeway International, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MORSA v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00665
Plaintiff:
JOHN MORSA
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. and DYNACRAFT BSC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brouillette v. Dynacraft BSC, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00063
Plaintiff:
Kevin Brouillette
Defendant:
Dynacraft BSC, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
