Cases 31 - 40 of 1,031
Smith v. D.O.N. et al
as 2:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
John M. Smith
Defendant:
D.O.N., Bean and James Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Blango v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Matthew Blango
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardeley v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Marque Gardeley
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ribar v. State of Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Drew Ribar
Defendant:
State of Nevada Department of Corrections, Carson City, Carson City Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Miller v. Dzurendas et al
as 2:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Jarrett Miller
Defendant:
James Dzurendas and C/O Ernest Floor C/O
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Sisolak, et al.
as 24-940
Plaintiff:
KEITH WILLIAM SULLIVAN
Defendant:
STEVEN SISOLAK, JOSEPH LOMBARDO, CHARLES DANIELS and others
Meadows v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Daisy Lynne Meadows
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, M. Lead, B. Schafer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pattison v. Lombardo, et al.
as 24-478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE H PATTISON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE LOMBARDO, BRIAN SANDOVAL, STEVE SISOLAK and others
Jones v. Gittere et al
as 2:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Brett Jones
Defendant:
William Gittere, James Dzurenda, Gabriel Najera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-398
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, Division of Forestry; Bureau of Land Management, DE LA GARZA, JOE LOMBARDO, Sheriff and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
