Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Williams v. Cohen et al
as 1:2023cv03045
Plaintiff: John T Williams
Defendant: Mark H Cohen, Steven D Grimberg, Thomas W Thrash, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. King et al
as 1:2019cv04856
Plaintiff: John T. Williams and Williams, Scott & Associates LLC
Defendant: Magistrate Judge Janet King, Magistrate Judge E. Clayton Scofield, III and Magistrate Judge Gerrilyn G. Brill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Jackson et al
as 1:2016cv04519
Plaintiff: Stephenson Lamar Smith
Defendant: Ted Jackson, Eric Henry, S. Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard et al v. Collins et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00111
Plaintiff: Robert Heard
Defendant: Doug Collins, Nathan Deal, Casey Cagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandon Jackson v. Gene Johnson, et al
as 14-12208
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRANDON JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee: GENE JOHNSON, KELLY A. LEE, E. CLAYTON SCOFIELD, III, Judge and others
HEARD v. OWENS et al
as 7:2014cv00021
Plaintiff: ROBERT HEARD
Defendant: BRIAN OWENS, AVANT EDENFIELD, W LEON BARFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Johnson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv02589
Plaintiff: Brandon Jackson
Defendant: Gene Johnson, Kelly A. Lee, E. Clayton Scofield, III and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02177
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
HEARD v. FIELDS et al
as 5:2012cv00029
Plaintiff: ROBERT HEARD
Defendant: RAMACHANDRA R PAIDI, CHARLES PANNELL, JR, CHARLES A MOYE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Pannell et al
as 1:2011cv04280
Plaintiff: Robert Heard
Defendant: Charles A. Pannell, Jr., E. Clayton Scofield, III, Sonny Perdue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?