Cases 1 - 10 of 10
El v. Chun
as 24-1142
Defendant:
BLAIR, JOSEPH FUCITO, Sergeant PETER LITRA, Shield #1197 and others
Plaintiff:
SAGE EL
DeLuna v. Levy et al
as 1:2020cv01012
Defendant:
Allison P Pieroni, Melton Montoya, Eva Montoya and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Robert DeLuna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El v. Chun et al
as 1:2018cv02398
Defendant:
A. Borrok, D.O.C. Standard Specialist Badge #226, Andrew Cuomo and others
Plaintiff:
Sage El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mary and Joseph Demic et al v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
as 1:2013cv06873
Plaintiff:
Anton and Nancy Sears Shipman, Lisa Fernandez, John and Katherine Frain and others
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Joseph and Mary Demic v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 1:2013cv06663
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Joseph and Mary Demic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001 National Insurance Flood Act
Dubose v. DMH et al
as 1:2012cv05861
Plaintiff:
Jerrold Eugene Dubose
Defendant:
DMH, Michael Hogan, Vincent Micolli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dupigny v. Greenaway et al
as 1:2012cv04701
Plaintiff:
Hubert Dupigny
Defendant:
Tanisha Greenaway, John Doe (Police Officer), Pinleney (Police Officer) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazer v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv07570
Plaintiff:
Horace Frazer
Defendant:
City of New York, Leah Ross, Demic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence Demic v. Ricoh Americas-Ricoh Business Systems et al
as 2:2010cv02757
Defendant:
DOES and Ricoh Americas-Ricoh Business Systems
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Demic
YOUNG v. SLATOWSKI et al
as 2:2007cv04840
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, NURSE LENGEL, C/O SLATOWSKI and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
