Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 173
Jones v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02059
Plaintiff: Lynn E. Jones
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Campbell et al
as 5:2024cv11028
Plaintiff: Ronald E. Jones
Defendant: S. Campbell and J. Bush
Diane Owens, et al v. FirstEnergy Corporation, et al
as 23-3945
Not Classified By Court: In re: FIRSTENERGY CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: DIANE OWENS, CHANA FRAND, CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant: FIRSTENERGY CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellant: CHARLES E. JONES
IUVO LOGISTICS, LLC v. JONES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00205
Plaintiff: IUVO LOGISTICS, LLC
Defendant: WILLIAM E JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jones v. Buchanan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00452
Plaintiff: Derryn-Nicole Jones, Dwight Earl Jones, Derryn-Nicole Nesbitt and others
Defendant: Judge Beth A. Buchanan, Trustee Margret Burks, Attorney LeAnn E. Covey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Empl Ret Sys of St. Louis, et al v. Charles Jones, et al
as 23-3512
Plaintiff / Appellee: EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Derivatively on behalf of FirstEnergy Corp., ELECTRICAL WORKERS PENSION FUND, LOCAL 103, I.B.E.W., Co-Lead Plaintiff - Case No. 2:20-cv-5128, MASSACHUSETTS LABORERS PENSION FUND, Derivatively on Behalf of FirstEnergy Corp. Case No. 2:20-cv-5237 and others
Appellant: TODD AUGENBAUM
Defendant / Appellee: CHARLES E. JONES, MICHAEL J. ANDERSON, STEVEN J. DEMETRIOU and others
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1471
Plaintiff / Appellee: WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Defendant: VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated
Appellant: VISSER AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC, DONALD RAY VISSER, DONOVAN VISSER and others
Defendant / Appellee: ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI, ANTRIM COUNTY, MI and others
In re: Charles Jones
as 23-0305
Petitioner: In re: CHARLES E. JONES
Respondent: DIANE OWENS, CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, LOS ANGELES COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION and others
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1339
Plaintiff / Appellee: WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Intervenor: TAYLOR BEIGHTOL
Defendant / Appellee: VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated, ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI and others
In re: Frederick Grainger, Jr., et al
as 23-103
Petitioner: In re: FREDERICK GRAINGER, JR., BRIAN BEHOVITZ, MINDY CALKINS and others
Respondent: WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?