Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Jones v. USA
as 4:2023cv00656
Petitioner:
Shane E Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02454
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Jones
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Brian E Jones and Brian E. Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Buffalo River Watershed Alliance v. United States Forest Service et al
as 3:2023cv03012
Plaintiff:
Buffalo River Watershed Alliance
Defendant:
United States Forest Service and Timothy E. Jones
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jones v. ARC Automotive, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
Hannah Jones and Hannah E. Jones
Defendant:
ARC Automotive, Inc., Hyundai Motor Group, Hyundai Motor Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 pl MDL: Products Liability
Jones v. State of Ne DHHS BMH Lancaster County
as 8:2022cv00342
Petitioner:
James E. Jones
Respondent:
State of Ne DHHS BMH Lancaster County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. State of Nebraska DHHS et al
as 4:2022cv03172
Plaintiff:
James E. Jones
Defendant:
State of Nebraska DHHS, Christopher D. Seifert, Dr. Rajeev Chattarveti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. USA
as 4:2020cv00144
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Shane E Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones v. Forte et al
as 4:2019cv00483
Petitioner:
Reginald E. Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
Diana Turner and Darryl Forte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2019cv00746
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Jones and Barbara S. Jones
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
