Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Johnson v. USA
as 4:2023cv12788
Petitioner:
Kaylin E. Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. Genesee County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv10182
Plaintiff:
Kaylin E. Johnson
Defendant:
Genesee County Jail and Skinner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Christian Healthcare Centers, Inc. v. Nessel et al
as 1:2022cv00787
Plaintiff:
Christian Healthcare Centers, Inc.
Defendant:
Dana Nessel, John E. Johnson, Jr., Portia L. Roberson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Woody #694786 v. Erickson et al
as 2:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
John David Woody #694786
Defendant:
P. Erickson, D. Viitala, K. Pelky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shull v. Dynamic Transportation LLC et al
as 2:2020cv11299
Plaintiff:
Leroy Shull
Defendant:
Joseph E Johnson and Dynamic Transportation LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Offie of Personnel Management
as 2:2017cv10527
Plaintiff:
Harriette E Johnson
Defendant:
Offie of Personnel Management , Federal Employees Group Life Insurance Program, Metropolitan Life Insurance Comapny and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Harriette E. Johnson Trust, UAD September 28, 2011 v. United States Office of Personnel Management et al
as 2:2017cv10467
Defendant:
United States Office of Personnel Management , Federal Employees Group Life Insurance Program , Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Harriette E. Johnson Trust, UAD September 28, 2011
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
