Cases 1 - 10 of 77
TURNER v. VESTBERG et al
as 3:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
JANIS TURNER
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Not Yet Classified:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GABEL v. VESTBERG et al
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
GERRY GABEL
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
MOORE v. VESTBERG et al
as 3:2023cv23071
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY MOORE
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
TURNER v. VESTBERG et al
as 2:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
JANIS TURNER
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SARVER v. VESTBERG et al
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
WADE SARVER
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
JANKOWSKI v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv21123
Plaintiff:
ANDREW JANKOWSKI
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS and others
Slater v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
as 3:2023cv02926
Plaintiff:
Jarrett E. Slater
Defendant:
Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
NELSON v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00737
Plaintiff:
EDWARD MAURICE NELSON
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, ROCKY JOYNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUTLER v. KIMBROUGH et al
as 1:2021cv00782
Plaintiff:
WAYNE H. BUTLER
Defendant:
SHERIFF BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, CHIEF DEPUTY ROCKY JOYNER, DIRECTOR ROBERT E. SLATER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CISNEROS v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00576
Plaintiff:
GENRI CISNEROS
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, ROCKY JOYNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
