Cases 1 - 10 of 72
TICE v. WILSON et al.
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERT TICE
Defendant:
HARRY E. WILSON, PA STATE POLICE, MEGAN'S LAW SECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TICE v. WILSON et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
JAMES ROBERT TICE
Respondent:
HARRY E. WILSON and PA STATE POLICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GOOLD et al v. OPERA et al
as 2:2023cv03527
Plaintiff:
SHERRY ANN GOOLD and BRADFORD E. WILSON
Defendant:
DANIEL OPERA, MARY ROSE OPERA, UPPER SOUTHAMPTON TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henriquez v. Wilson et al
as 1:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
Julio Henriquez
Defendant:
Harry E. Willson, Chelsea Leasing, LLC, Pottles Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WILSON v. WOLFE et al
as 2:2019cv02405
Defendant:
TOM WOLFE, BLANCH CARNEY and JOHN DELANEY
Plaintiff:
RONALD E. WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv03108
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. WILSON
Defendant:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, TRANS UNION, LLC and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WILSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv07844
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD E. WILSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICE OF SUPPORTIVE HOUSING, JIM OKEEFE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv57659
Plaintiff:
EARL E. WILSON
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
