Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wright v. Geo Group INC
as 2:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Timothy E. Wright, Jr.
Defendant:
Geo Group INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Virginia Peninsula Regional Jail et al
as 4:2016cv00057
Plaintiff:
John E. Wright
Defendant:
Virginia Peninsula Regional Jail, Vincent Russell and Desaline Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Clarke et al
as 2:2014cv00086
Plaintiff:
Paul C. Thompson, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, David B. Everett, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alston v. Wright et al
as 1:2012cv00582
Plaintiff:
Clarence Alston
Defendant:
E. Wright, S.M. Hardy and T. Sites
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baber et al v. County of Frederick, Virginia et al
as 5:2012cv00037
Plaintiff:
Scott Baber, Kim C. Bohrer, Jeffrey S. Bowerman and others
Defendant:
County of Frederick, Virginia, Frederick County Sheriff's Office, John R. Riley, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lipscomb v. Bacon et al
as 2:2010cv00511
Plaintiff:
Jerry A. Lipscomb
Defendant:
W. Bacon, V. Bullock, B. Bullock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lipscomb v. Hill et al
as 2:2010cv00473
Plaintiff:
Jerry A. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Hill, Nelson, Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Wright
as 2:2007cv00447
Petitioner:
Isaac Lagrant Walker
Respondent:
Edward E. Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanko v. McDonnell et al
as 1:2007cv00691
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sanko, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert F. McDonnell, Gary L. Bass, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart v. Wright
as 1:2007cv00473
Petitioner:
Antonio D. Stewart
Respondent:
E. Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
