Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Brooks et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2012cv02229
Plaintiff:
Wanda E. Brooks and Dominic Brooks
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Tennessee Valley Authority et al
as 3:2012cv00026
Plaintiff:
Matthew Landon Jones
Defendant:
Tennessee Valley Authority, Tom Kilgore, Brian Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv43111
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. BROOKS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BROOKS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv40345
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. BROOKS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BROOKS V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv35578
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. BROOKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
BROOKS v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv93833
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. BROOKS
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROOKSv. GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY
as 2:2009cv93787
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. BROOKS
Defendant:
GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROOKS v. H. B. FULLER COMPANY
as 2:2009cv93907
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. BROOKS
Defendant:
H. B. FULLER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROOKS v. AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv93804
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. BROOKS
Defendant:
AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROOKS v. CONGOLEUM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv93868
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. BROOKS
Defendant:
CONGOLEUM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
