Cases 1 - 10 of 96
ALKHATIB v. RICHARDS et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
LATIF ALKHATIB
Defendant:
M. RICHARDS, E. BROWN, R. WESTOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TIERNO v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TIERNO
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ESTOCK, E, BROWN, CAPTAIN BOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
REYNOLDS et al v. BROWN et al
as 2:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
EDWARD REYNOLDS, LENISE SUTTON, LAWRENCE PETERKIN and others
Defendant:
MEIJAH E BROWN, KARIM S BROWN and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
BROWN v. ENDERS et al
as 1:2021cv00356
Plaintiff:
SCOTTY E. BROWN
Defendant:
SHANE ENDERS, SGT. YOUNG and LT. DUDAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Brown v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 3:2021cv02048
Plaintiff:
Robert Brown doing business as Dr. Robert E. Brown Optometrist
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and Christopher M. Stasko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown et al v. Hagerty Insurance Agency, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00818
Plaintiff:
James E. Brown and Belinda Brown
Defendant:
Hagerty Insurance Agency, LLC and Essentia Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv01996
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA E. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CADMUS v. THE BROWN FIRM, PLLC et al
as 2:2018cv04775
Defendant:
THE BROWN FIRM, PLLC, BRUCE A. JONES, CONSUMER LAW, PLLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD R. CADMUS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TALBERT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv04374
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, E. BROWN, D. T. THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALBERT v. DUNKIN et al
as 2:2017cv04375
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
G. DUNKIN, H. ANDERSON and E. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
