Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. A&Y Rehabilitation Medical Center, Corp. et al
as 1:2026cv25574
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Co., Geico Indemnity Co., Geico General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
A&Y Rehabilitation Medical Center, Corp., M.D. Scott Willis, Alejandro Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2026cv00597
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yennier Capote Gonzalez v. U.S. Attorney General
as 26-12735
Petitioner:
YENNIER CAPOTE GONZALEZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1253
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05032
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
In re: E. Palestine Train Derailment
as 26-3499
Plaintiff:
BARBARA ADAMS, ERIC ADKINS, IAN BAKER and others
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY and NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
