Cases 11 - 20 of 49
CLAYTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv01340
Plaintiff:
SALLIE E. CLAYTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Heard et al v. Deal et al
as 2:2014cv00179
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Doug Collins, G.B.I. Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard et al v. Collins et al
as 2:2014cv00111
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Doug Collins, Nathan Deal, Casey Cagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandon Jackson v. Gene Johnson, et al
as 14-12208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDON JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, KELLY A. LEE, E. CLAYTON SCOFIELD, III, Judge and others
Clayton v. New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission et al
as 1:2014cv02238
Defendant:
Attorney General United States/U.S. Department of Justice, Greater Jamaica Development Corporation, Metropolitan Transportation Authority/ Police Department/District 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Dane E. Clayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clayton v. New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission et al
as 1:2014cv02075
Plaintiff:
Dane E. Clayton
Defendant:
New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission, New York City Department of Transportation, Metropolitan Transportation Authority/Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEARD v. OWENS et al
as 7:2014cv00021
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARD
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, AVANT EDENFIELD, W LEON BARFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Johnson et al
as 1:2013cv02589
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jackson
Defendant:
Gene Johnson, Kelly A. Lee, E. Clayton Scofield, III and others
Heard v. O'Kelly et al
as 1:2013cv02507
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
William O'Kelly, E. Clayton Scofield, Sam Olens and others
Heard v. O'Kelly et al
as 1:2013cv02105
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
William C. O'Kelly, C. Ashley Royal, E. Clayton Scofield and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
