Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Lyday v. St Anthony Hospital et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00479
Plaintiff: Kevin Gene Lyday
Defendant: St Anthony Hospital, Walter E Martin and Chad Barr
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pizano v. Indiana State of et al
as 2:2008cv00292
Plaintiff: Alvino Pizano
Defendant: Indiana State of, Porter County of, Indiana Dept of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Haskins v. Lanter et al
as 2:2008cv00196
Plaintiff: Dwayne Haskins
Defendant: Dean R Lanter, John E Martin and Lucy Lisiecki
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Civil Rights None
Strowmatt v. Martin
as 3:2008cv00033
Petitioner: Timothy E Strowmatt
Respondent: Walter E Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Martin
as 3:2008cv00025
Plaintiff: Eric T Mitchell
Defendant: Walter E Martin, Garber, Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. MARTIN
as 1:2008cv00017
Plaintiff: ERIC T. MITCHELL
Defendant: WALTER E. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cardwell v. Martin
as 3:2008cv00010
Petitioner: Kevin M Cardwell
Respondent: Walter E Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holden v. Martin
as 3:2008cv00001
Petitioner: Thomas Holden
Respondent: Walter E Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Veal Sr v. Martin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00003
Petitioner: Kenneth S Veal Sr
Respondent: Walter E Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARDWELL v. MARTIN
as 1:2007cv01633
Petitioner: KEVIN M. CARDWELL
Defendant: WALTER E. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?