Cases 1 - 10 of 61
(PC) Harper v. Pohovich et al
as 1:2024cv01550
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
R. Hayne, CDCR, E. Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Pohovich et al
as 2:2024cv03668
Defendant:
S. Pohovich, R. Hayne, E. Moreno and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Osuna v. Campbell, et al.
as 1:2024cv01156
Defendant:
T. Campbell, B. McKinney, S. Gates and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie Osuna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman v. Moreno et al
as 3:2024cv01242
Defendant:
K. Cardenas, U. Rodriguez, F. Aceves and others
Plaintiff:
Audree Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Ten 01 Live LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01347
Defendant:
David A Singh, Rudy E Moreno and Ten 01 Live LLC doing business as Ten 01 Bistro doing business as Ten 01 Bistro & Ten 01 Live
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moreno v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65424
Plaintiff:
Raquel E. Moreno
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MORENO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00857
Plaintiff:
JOSE E MORENO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Devonte Harris v. K Kyle, et al
as 22-16895
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVONTE BERNARD HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
K KYLE, RALPH DIAZ, KEN CLARKE and others
Haisani Reynolds v. Raymond Madden, et al
as 22-55351
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAISANI REYNOLDS
Defendant / Appellee:
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Warden, ROCK JOHNSON, (A) Warden, FELIX M. VASQUEZ, (AD) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
