Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Chatman v. Moreno et al
as 3:2024cv01242
Defendant:
K. Cardenas, U. Rodriguez, F. Aceves and others
Plaintiff:
Audree Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Ten 01 Live LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01347
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Ten 01 Live LLC d/b/a Ten 01 Bistro and d/b/a Ten 01 Bistro & Ten 01 Live, Rudy E. Moreno and David A. Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moreno v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65424
Plaintiff:
Raquel E. Moreno
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MORENO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00857
Plaintiff:
JOSE E MORENO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Devonte Harris v. K Kyle, et al
as 22-16895
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVONTE BERNARD HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
K KYLE, RALPH DIAZ, KEN CLARKE and others
Haisani Reynolds v. Raymond Madden, et al
as 22-55351
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAISANI REYNOLDS
Defendant / Appellee:
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Warden, ROCK JOHNSON, (A) Warden, FELIX M. VASQUEZ, (AD) and others
Moreno v. Salmonson
as 5:2022cv00004
Petitioner:
Jesus E Moreno
Respondent:
Warden S. Salmonson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(PC) Arena v. Cervantes et al
as 1:2021cv00928
Defendant:
E. Cerda-Jirano, W. Cervantes, E. Moreno and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Michael Arena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Madden et al
as 3:2021cv00955
Defendant:
E. Sanchez, Felix M. Vasquez, Raymond Madden and others
Plaintiff:
Haisani Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
