Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
PARKER v. TICE, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01654
Plaintiff: STEPHEN PARKER
Defendant: E. TICE, M. HOUSER, M. PYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. WETZEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00144
Plaintiff: DONALD BANKS
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL, E. Tice, JAMES C. BARNACLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BENTON v. TICE et al
as 2:2020cv01294
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and MR. E. TICE
Petitioner: JAMES E. BENTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWNE v. SCI SOMERSET et al
as 3:2020cv00021
Plaintiff: JOSHUA BROWNE
Defendant: SCI SOMERSET, E. TICE and DR. SMUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BROWNE v. SCI SOMERSET et al
as 2:2019cv06015
Plaintiff: JOSHUA BROWNE
Defendant: SCI SOMERSET, E. TICE and DR. SMUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNES v. MEDVA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00202
Defendant: SCI SOMERSET SECURITY DEPT., LT. LINDSEY, CO GIBSON and others
Plaintiff: BRANDON DANTE BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Raymond Brown v. C. Green, et al
as 19-2450
Defendant / Appellee: G. RALSTON, JOHN E. WETZEL, D. VARNER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAYMOND BROWN
Raymond Brown v. C. Green, et al
as 19-1670
Defendant / Appellee: G. RALSTON, JOHN E. WETZEL, D. VARNER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAYMOND BROWN
SEXTON v. TICE et al
as 3:2018cv01478
Defendant: Capt. K Kauffman, CORRECTION OFFICER KINZEY, Spencer and others
Plaintiff: CHARLES SEXTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEXTON v. TICE et al
as 2:2018cv03034
Defendant: CORRECTION OFFICER KINZEY, SUPERINTENDENT K. KAUFFMAN, CORRECTION OFFICER WEAKLAND and others
Plaintiff: CHARLES SEXTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?