Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Farshid v. Allen Indep Sch Dist
as 23-40532
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Najva Farshid, on behalf of her child, E.K., a minor
Defendant / Appellee:
Allen Independent School District, through its Board of Trustees, Julie Young, in her official and individual capacity, Terreva Bryant, in her official and individual capacity and others
Scott v. Austin Regional
as 23-50436
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeremy Scott, Ashley Combs, as next friend of L.S., a minor child, Juan Silva and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Austin Regional Clinic, Donald Kreag Murphey, Medical Doctor, ARA Diagnostic Imaging and others
Valentinis-Dee v. Gunther et al
as 4:2023cv00716
Petitioner:
James Valentinis-Dee
Respondent:
Jason Gunther and E.K. Carolton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Valentinis-Dee v. Gunther et al
as 4:2023cv00695
Petitioner:
James Valentinis-Dee
Respondent:
Jason Gunther and E.K. Carrolton USP 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wade v. Akaka et al
as 2:2012cv00179
Plaintiff:
E.K. Wade
Defendant:
Daniel Akaka, Lamar Alexander, Kelly Ayotte and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Wade v. Obama et al
as 2:2011mc00073
Plaintiff:
E.K. Wade
Defendant:
Barak Obama, Eric K. Shinseki and United States of America
Mick Haig Productions e.K., et al v. Does 1-670
as 11-10977
Plaintiff:
MICK HAIG PRODUCTIONS E.K.
Appellant:
EVAN F. STONE
Defendant - Appellant:
DOES 1-670
Doe 106 v. Mick Haig Productions, e.K.
as 3:2011mc00012
Plaintiff:
Doe 106
Defendant:
Mick Haig Productions e.K.
Mick Haig Productions, e.K. vs. Does, et al.
as 3:2010cv01900
Plaintiff:
Mick Haig Productions, e.K.
Defendant:
Does 1-670
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Harms v. Imperial Palace of Mississippi, LLC. et al
as 1:2010cv00231
Plaintiff:
Carl E.K. Harms
Defendant:
Imperial Palace of Mississippi, LLC. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
