Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 27
KING v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2020cv05766
Defendant: MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATON, NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff: EARL KING
In Re: PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Earl King v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 19-40795
Petitioner / Appellant: EARL KING
Respondent / Appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
In re: Earl King
as 19-10358
Petitioner: In re: EARL KING, also known as Earl Lee King, also known as Earl Abraham
In re: Earl King
as 19-10368
Petitioner: In re: EARL KING, also known as Earl L. King, also known as Earl Abraham
King v. Davis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00143
Defendant: Barbara Sapp, Unnamed Ombudsman, Charles Horsely and others
Plaintiff: Earl King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Davis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00144
Defendant: Charles Horsely, Lorie Davis, NFN Ramirez and others
Plaintiff: Earl King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Director TDCJ - CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00085
Respondent: Director TDCJ - CID and Director, TDCJ-ID
Petitioner: Earl King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. LaSalle Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00109
Plaintiff: Earl King
Defendant: LaSalle Corrections, Regina Lynch, Rodney Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Duffy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01695
Petitioner: James Earl King
Respondent: Brian Duffy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv62173
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?