Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,013
Earnest Hall v. USA
as 23-5656
Petitioner / Appellant: EARNEST BRADLEY HALL
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Earnest Hall v. USA
as 23-5652
Petitioner / Appellant: EARNEST BRADLEY HALL
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Glover Jr v. Eke et al
as 4:2023cv02647
Plaintiff: Ernest Lee Glover Jr and Earnest Lee Glover, Jr.
Defendant: Correctional Officer Eke and Correctional Officer Arenau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. USA
as 4:2023cv00641
Petitioner: Earnest Lynn Ross
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Johnson v. Dozier
as 23-20293
Plaintiff / Appellant: Earnest Key Johnson
Defendant / Appellee: Kelly Dozier and Brazos County Jail
Earnest v. Lake Villa Police Dept et al
as 1:2023cv03932
Plaintiff: Royce Dale Earnest
Defendant: Lake Villa Police Dept, Arresting Officer Defski #81 and Round Lake Beach P. Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dicky
as 4:2023cv01948
Petitioner: Earnest K. Johnson
Respondent: Wayne Dicky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Woloshin et al
as 1:2023cv00527
Plaintiff: Quentin T. Jones
Defendant: Natalie S. Woloshin esq., Patrick J. Collins esq., Eric H. Zubrow esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDavid v. Gonzalez
as 23-10427
Plaintiff / Appellant: Roy Lynn McDavid
Defendant / Appellee: Adam Gonzalez, Head Warden, Michael Miller, Assistant Warden, David S. Dyer, High Security and others
Brooks v. City of Sumter, S.C. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01665
Plaintiff: Thomas Reginald Brooks
Defendant: City of Sumter, S.C., David Werchat, Earnest A. Finneys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?