Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Barclay v. Dixon
as 24-92
Defendant / Appellee:
MAKAYLA COOK, Police Officer, Sandusky Police Department, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Makayla Cook, TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Facility, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Tim Mcconahay, ROBERT A. DIXON, Attorney, Attorney at Law, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Robert A. Dixon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESHAWN MAURICE BARCLAY, a Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Merchant, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal ohioan national, and subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
POWERS v. WEBB et al
as 2:2023cv04679
Plaintiff:
RACHEL GENEVIEVE POWERS
Defendant:
JEREMIAH DARNELL WEBB, NOAH SENCER ROBERT BARCLAY, MALAKAI LEVI LYNCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
barclay et al v. dixon et al
as 1:2023cv10272
Plaintiff:
leshawn maurice barclay
Defendant:
webb, jeremiah darnell Estate et al, barclay, noah sencer robert Estate et al, lynch, malakai levi Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hogan v. Smith
as 3:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Tremain Hogan
Defendant:
Annette Chambers Smith, Warden Ed Banks, Micheal Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spencer v. Sheldon et al
as 1:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Spencer
Defendant:
Ed Sheldon, Scott Basquin, James Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodson v. Remish et al
as 4:2021cv02291
Plaintiff:
Aaron Woodson
Defendant:
Mr. Remish, Mr. Jackson, Warden Richard Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Billiter, Jr. v. Banks
as 5:2011cv01996
Petitioner:
Fred Billiter, Jr.
Respondent:
Ed Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Foster v. Banks
as 1:2010cv01578
Petitioner:
Albert Foster
Respondent:
Ed Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tobin v. Banks
as 3:2008cv00433
Petitioner:
Dale Tobin
Respondent:
Ed Banks
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
