Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Hanson v. Dowling et al
as 4:2024cv01473
Plaintiff:
Christina J. Hanson
Defendant:
Charles D. Dowling, Jim Gaines, Scott Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sanchez Araujo v. Great Northern Transportation Co. et al
as 1:2023cv15044
Plaintiff:
Eddy Sanchez Araujo
Defendant:
Great Northern Transportation Co. and Charles DeHart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Ronald Eddie Sanchez v. Warden
as 5:2022cv01680
Petitioner:
Ronald Eddie Sanchez
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
G.I.S.E. et al v. City of Chico et al
as 2:2022cv01654
Plaintiff:
G.I.S.E. and Eddie Sanchez
Defendant:
City of Chico, Mark Bass and David Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Warden
as 3:2022cv01435
Petitioner:
Ronald Eddie Sanchez
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
G.I.S.E. et al v. City of Chico et al
as 2:2022at00962
Plaintiff:
G.I.S.E. and Eddie Sanchez
Defendant:
City of Chico, Mark Bass and David Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
SANCHEZ SOTO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv46525
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
COLON EDDIE SANCHEZ SOTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez v. Dart et al
as 1:2019cv04139
Defendant:
Unknown Cook County Jail Maintenance Staff, Thomas Dart and Unknown Cook County Jail Security Staff
Plaintiff:
Eddie Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Miles et al
as 1:2019cv04143
Defendant:
S Miles, Henzie, Okezie and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12358
Plaintiff:
Gennaro Prudente, Minerva Rodriguez, Chrystal Pierre and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
