Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Nobili v. Chevron USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00022
Defendant:
Williams Olefins LLC, Pharmacia Corp., South Hampton Refining, Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Donnamarie Nobili
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Floyd et al v. BP p.l.c. et al
as 4:2021cv00132
Defendant:
Robert Lee Bolin, EPEC Oil Company Liquidating Trust, BP America Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lorena Ann Goforth, Jennifer Gail Robinson, Virginia Floyd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grynberg v. El Paso Natural Gas Co., et al
as 15-8066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES EX REL JACK J. GRYNBERG
Defendant - Appellee:
EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY, DBA El Paso Energy Corporation, TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, EAST TENNESSEE NATURAL GAS COMPANY and others
In re: Natural Gas
as 15-8054
:
In re: NATURAL GAS ROYALTIES QUI TAM LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. JACK J. GRYNBERG
Defendant - Appellee:
PACIFIC INTERSTATE OFFSHORE COMPANY, a California corporation, PACIFIC OFFSHORE PIPELINE COMPANY, a California corporation, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY, a California corporation and others
Defendant:
ORYX ENERGY COMPANY, PACIFIC GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY, n/k/a Gas Transmission Northwest Corporation, NORTHERN BORDER PIPELINE CO. and others
Lyondell Chemical Company, et al v. Albemarle Corporation, et al
as 11-40218
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EL PASO TENNESSEE PIPELINE CO, EPEC POLYMERS INC, TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE CO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP
Lyondell Chemical Co v. Albemarle Corp, et al
as 08-40061
Third Party Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
EPEC POLYMERS INC, EPEC CORP and EL PASO TENNESSEE PIPELINE CO
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE CO, formerly known as Tenneco Inc
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
LUBRIZOL CORP and OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP
Defendant - Appellee:
CHEVRON USA, INC., EXXON MOBIL CORP and PPG INDUSTRIES INC
Lyondell Chemical Co, et al v. Albemarle Corp, et al
as 08-40060
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
LYONDELL CHEMICAL CO and ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE CO
Third Party Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
EL PASO TENNESSEE PIPELINE CO, EPEC CORP and EPEC POLYMERS INC
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
LUBRIZOL CORP and OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP
Defendant - Appellee:
CHEVRON USA, INC., EXXON MOBIL CORP and PPG INDUSTRIES INC
In re: Natural Gas
as 08-8004
:
In re: NATURAL GAS ROYALTIES QUI TAM LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK J. GRYNBERG, ex rel. United States
Defendant - Appellee:
PACIFIC INTERSTATE OFFSHORE COMPANY, a California corporation, PACIFIC OFFSHORE PIPELINE COMPANY, a California corporation, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY, a California corporation and others
Defendant:
ORYX ENERGY COMPANY
Lyondell Chemical Co, et al v. Albemarle Corp, et al
as 08-40025
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
LYONDELL CHEMICAL CO and ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO
Third Party Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
EPEC POLYMERS INC, EPEC CORP and EL PASO TENNESSEE PIPELINE CO
Defendant - Appellee:
EXXON MOBIL CORP, PPG INDUSTRIES INC and CHEVRON USA, INC.
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE CO, formerly known as Tenneco Inc and OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
LUBRIZOL CORP
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, formerly known as Rhone Poulenc AG Company Inc
In re: Natural Gas
as 06-8099
:
In re: NATURAL GAS ROYALTIES QUI TAM LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK J. GRYNBERG, ex rel. United States
Defendant - Appellee:
PACIFIC INTERSTATE OFFSHORE COMPANY, a California corporation, PACIFIC OFFSHORE PIPELINE COMPANY, a California corporation, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY, a California corporation and others
Defendant:
ORYX ENERGY COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
